State v. Ahart

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Ahart

764 N.E.2d 1038, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1509, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 761

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 20, 2002

Docket01-2019

StatusPublished

This text of 764 N.E.2d 1038 (State v. Ahart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Ahart, 764 N.E.2d 1038, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1509, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 761 (Ohio 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Mahoning App. No. 93CA211. Reported at 94 Ohio St.3d 1452, 762 N.E.2d 370. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents, would allow on Proposition of Law No. I, and would hold this cause for the decision in 01-733 and 01-957, State v. Parker, Cuyahoga App. No. 76395. Cook, J., dissents, would allow on Propositions of Law Nos. I, IV, and V, and would hold this cause for the decision in 01-733 and 01-957. Moyer, C.J., dissents and would allow on all propositions of law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mahoning App. No. 93CA211. Reported at 94 Ohio St.3d 1452, 762 N.E.2d 370. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents, would allow on Proposition of Law No. I, and would hold this cause for the decision in 01-733 and 01-957, State v. Parker, Cuyahoga App. No. 76395. Cook, J., dissents, would allow on Propositions of Law Nos. I, IV, and V, and would hold this cause for the decision in 01-733 and 01-957. Moyer, C.J., dissents and would allow on all propositions of law.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

764 N.E.2d 1038, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1509, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ahart-ohio-2002.