State v. Aguillard

254 So. 3d 685
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Aguillard. Read the opinion of the Court — 2016 La. LEXIS 341
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided October 15, 2018·No. No. 2015-K-0589·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Writ denied; motion denied. The state has returned following the trial court's compliance with this court's order on remand. State v. Aguillard , 15-0589 (La. 2/26/16), 184 So.3d 1273. We hereby deny the state's motion for additional clarification from the trial court and deny the state's writ in full. We leave intact the decision of the court of appeal, vacating the conviction and sentence, and remanding for a new trial. State v. Aguillard , 14-0316 (La. App. 4 Cir. 3/4/15), 158 So.3d 976. The court of appeal reached the correct result because the trial court's failure to adequately record the bench conference concerning the challenge for cause of prospective juror Lt. Mark Mulla has resulted in actual prejudice to the defendant's appeal. See State v. Pinion , 06-2346 (La. 10/26/07), 968 So.2d 131.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Aguillard, 254 So. 3d 685 (La. 2018).

254 So. 3d 685 (State v. Aguillard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Pinion
968 So. 2d 131 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2007)
State v. Aguillard
158 So. 3d 976 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2015)
State v. Aguillard
184 So. 3d 1273 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2016)