State v. Agrest

Supreme Court of New Jersey

State v. Agrest

107 A. 419, 93 N.J.L. 253, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 154

DecidedJune 20, 1919

StatusPublished

This text of 107 A. 419 (State v. Agrest) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Agrest, 107 A. 419, 93 N.J.L. 253, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 154 (N.J. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case was agreed to he submitted on briefs, and the brief of the defendant in error was filed within time. Ko brief has been filed by or on behalf of the plaintiffs in error within the time limited by rule 35, as amended May 19th, 1904, nor at any other time. Therefore, the writ of error is considered to be abandoned, as provided in the rule, and the judgment under review will be affirmed.

For affirmance — Tiie Chancellor, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Hepkeniieimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 11.

For reversal — Kone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This case was agreed to he submitted on briefs, and the brief of the defendant in error was filed within time. Ko brief has been filed by or on behalf of the plaintiffs in error within the time limited by rule 35, as amended May 19th, 1904, nor at any other time. Therefore, the writ of error is considered to be abandoned, as provided in the rule, and the judgment under review will be affirmed.

For affirmance — Tiie Chancellor, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Hepkeniieimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 11.

For reversal — Kone.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

107 A. 419, 93 N.J.L. 253, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-agrest-nj-1919.