State v. Agnew
This text of 178 N.W.2d 592 (State v. Agnew) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant appeals from denial of an evidentiary hearing on his motion for post conviction relief from a judgment that we affirmed in State v. Agnew, 184 Neb. 700, 171 N. W. 2d 542 (1969). The motion raises issues which we there necessarily determined. Unless a miscarriage of justice is shown, the post conviction remedy is not available for reconsideration of questions that were determined by this court. State v. O’Kelly, 181 Neb. 618, 150 N. W. 2d 117 (1967). Justice has not miscarried here.
Other issues raised in defendant’s motion are without merit. The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
178 N.W.2d 592, 185 Neb. 716, 1970 Neb. LEXIS 624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-agnew-neb-1970.