State v. Agnew

52 Ark. 275
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided November 15, 1889·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam :

Indictment. The provision that the foreman of the grand jury shall sign the indorsement, “A true bill,” upon indictments, is directory, and the objection to the irregularity is waived, unless made before pleading. People v. Lawrence, 21 Cal., 372; State v. Mertens, 14 Mo., 94; State v. Creighton, 1 Nott & McCord, 256; Wam-kod-chow-neck-kow v. U. S., Morris, 1 Iowa, 332; State v. Cox, 6 Ire., 440; State v. Powell, 24 Texas, 135; State v. Murphy, 47 Mo., 274; State v. Shipley, 10 Minn., 223; State v. Brandon, 28 Ark., 411; State v. Johnson, 33 Ark., 174.

Reverse and remand, with directions to put defendant upon his trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Agnew, 52 Ark. 275 (Ark. 1889).

52 Ark. 275 (State v. Agnew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Hartman
Court of Appeals of Kansas, 2025
Withem v. State
299 S.W. 739 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1927)
State v. Jones
111 So. 492 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1926)
Horton v. Gillespie
279 S.W. 1020 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1926)
State v. Heft
134 N.W. 950 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1912)
Shinn v. State
124 S.W. 263 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1910)
McFall v. State
84 S.W. 479 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1904)
State v. Hill
35 S.E. 831 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1900)
Higgins v. Gager
47 S.W. 848 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1898)
State v. Williams
18 So. 647 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1895)