Home/Supreme Court of Arkansas/State v. Agnew

State v. Agnew

52 Ark. 275
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedNovember 15, 1889
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 52 Ark. 275 (State v. Agnew) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Agnew, 52 Ark. 275 (Ark. 1889).

Opinion

Per Curiam :

Indictment. The provision that the foreman of the grand jury shall sign the indorsement, “A true bill,” upon indictments, is directory, and the objection to the irregularity is waived, unless made before pleading. People v. Lawrence, 21 Cal., 372; State v. Mertens, 14 Mo., 94; State v. Creighton, 1 Nott & McCord, 256; Wam-kod-chow-neck-kow v. U. S., Morris, 1 Iowa, 332; State v. Cox, 6 Ire., 440; State v. Powell, 24 Texas, 135; State v. Murphy, 47 Mo., 274; State v. Shipley, 10 Minn., 223; State v. Brandon, 28 Ark., 411; State v. Johnson, 33 Ark., 174.

Reverse and remand, with directions to put defendant upon his trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Hartman
Court of Appeals of Kansas, 2025
Withem v. State
299 S.W. 739 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1927)
State v. Jones
111 So. 492 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1926)
Horton v. Gillespie
279 S.W. 1020 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1926)
State v. Heft
134 N.W. 950 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1912)
Shinn v. State
124 S.W. 263 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1910)
McFall v. State
84 S.W. 479 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1904)
State v. Hill
35 S.E. 831 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1900)
Higgins v. Gager
47 S.W. 848 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1898)
State v. Williams
18 So. 647 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1895)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 Ark. 275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-agnew-ark-1889.