State v. Afaga

Hawaii Supreme Court

State v. Afaga

532 P.2d 391, 56 Haw. 170

CourtHawaii Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 25, 1975

DocketNO. 5667

StatusPublished

This text of 532 P.2d 391 (State v. Afaga) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Afaga, 532 P.2d 391, 56 Haw. 170 (haw 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We believe, upon consideration of the record in this case, that it is necessary for the promotion of justice¹ to vacate the judgment and sentence of record.

We, therefore, vacate and set aside the judgment and sentence and remand this case to the trial court for the following limited purposes:

1. That the trial court enter anew a judgment and sentence;

2. That the trial court may, if it deems appropriate, recommend to the United States Attorney General that the appellant not be deported, in accordance with the provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1251(b) (2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We believe, upon consideration of the record in this case, that it is necessary for the promotion of justice¹ to vacate the judgment and sentence of record.

We, therefore, vacate and set aside the judgment and sentence and remand this case to the trial court for the following limited purposes:

1. That the trial court enter anew a judgment and sentence;

2. That the trial court may, if it deems appropriate, recommend to the United States Attorney General that the appellant not be deported, in accordance with the provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1251(b) (2).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

532 P.2d 391, 56 Haw. 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-afaga-haw-1975.

Opinion

1. That the trial court enter anew a judgment and sentence;

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack