State v. Adkins

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Adkins

331 S.W.3d 721, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 190, 2011 WL 590332

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 22, 2011·No. ED 94284·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Carjuan Adkins (Defendant) appeals from the judgment upon his conviction by a jury for domestic assault in the second degree, in violation of Section 565.073, RSMo ,2000, for which the trial court sentenced him to five-years’ imprisonment. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find Defendant is entitled to no relief on appeal. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion,for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Carjuan Adkins (Defendant) appeals from the judgment upon his conviction by a jury for domestic assault in the second degree, in violation of Section 565.073, RSMo ,2000, for which the trial court sentenced him to five-years’ imprisonment. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find Defendant is entitled to no relief on appeal. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion,for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Adkins, 331 S.W.3d 721, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 190, 2011 WL 590332 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

331 S.W.3d 721 (State v. Adkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related