State v. Adebogun
This text of 457 S.E.2d 699 (State v. Adebogun) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant was charged with driving under the influence, driving with an unlawful alcohol concentration and failure to maintain his lane. The trial court granted defendant’s motion to suppress the results of a state-administered breath test, based on the arresting officer’s failure to advise defendant of his right to have an additional test administered by a qualified person of his own choosing, and the State appeals.
The State acknowledges this case is controlled by our recent decision in State v. Causey, 215 Ga. App. 85 (449 SE2d 639) (1994) but, incorporating the arguments made in the State’s petition for certiorari in the Supreme Court, urges that Causey be overruled. However, on February 10, 1995, the Supreme Court denied the State’s petition for certiorari in Causey, and the State’s arguments do not convince us that Causey is unsound and should be overruled.
It is uncontroverted that the arresting officer in this case did not inform defendant of his right to an additional test administered by a [431]*431qualified person of his own choosing. It follows that the trial court did not err in granting defendant’s motion to exclude the results of the state-administered breath test. State v. Harrison, 216 Ga. App. 325 (453 SE2d 820) (1995); State v. Hassett, 216 Ga. App. 114 (453 SE2d 508) (1995); Causey, 215 Ga. App. at 86.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
457 S.E.2d 699, 217 Ga. App. 430, 95 Fulton County D. Rep. 1796, 1995 Ga. App. LEXIS 469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-adebogun-gactapp-1995.