State v. Adamse

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Adamse

440 S.W.3d 579, 2014 WL 4068183, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 865

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 19, 2014·No. No. ED 100260·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ronny R. Adamse appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of first-degree statutory sodomy. We find the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to grant Adamse’s request for a mistrial. We also find the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting portions of the victim’s interview with the Children’s Advocacy Center.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ronny R. Adamse appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of first-degree statutory sodomy. We find the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to grant Adamse’s request for a mistrial. We also find the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting portions of the victim’s interview with the Children’s Advocacy Center.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Adamse, 440 S.W.3d 579, 2014 WL 4068183, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 865 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

440 S.W.3d 579 (State v. Adamse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.