State v. Adams

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Adams

144 P.3d 1067, 208 Or. App. 490, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 1511

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Adams. Read the opinion of the Court — 193 Or. App. 469 →

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided October 4, 2006·No. 0510-70837; A130631·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant in this mental commitment case appeals a judgment committing her to the Mental Health Division for treatment for a period of time not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. The trial court found that appellant suffers from a mental disorder and is unable to meet her basic needs and is a danger to herself. A discussion of the facts would be of no benefit to the bench and bar. The state concedes that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence that appellant is unable to meet her basic needs or is a danger to herself. We find the state’s concession to be well founded and therefore accept it.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Appellant in this mental commitment case appeals a judgment committing her to the Mental Health Division for treatment for a period of time not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. The trial court found that appellant suffers from a mental disorder and is unable to meet her basic needs and is a danger to herself. A discussion of the facts would be of no benefit to the bench and bar. The state concedes that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence that appellant is unable to meet her basic needs or is a danger to herself. We find the state’s concession to be well founded and therefore accept it.

Reversed.

State v. Adams, 144 P.3d 1067, 208 Or. App. 490, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 1511 (Or. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

144 P.3d 1067 (State v. Adams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related