State v. Adams
This text of 936 P.2d 1011 (State v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The state appeals from a pretrial order suppressing the results of defendant’s field sobriety tests. ORS 138.060(3). We reverse and remand for proceedings not inconsistent with our opinion in State v. Spicer, 147 Or App 418, 936 P2d 1005 (1997).
On remand, we instruct the court to exclude any reference to defendant counting, and to admit evidence that defendant used his arms for balance and placed his foot down several times during the one-leg-stand test, and that he stepped off the line, did not walk heel-to-toe and pivoted rather than turned in the walk-and-turn test.
Reversed and remanded for proceedings not inconsistent with State v. Spicer, 147 Or App 418, 936 P2d 1005 (1997).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
936 P.2d 1011, 147 Or. App. 545, 1997 Ore. App. LEXIS 506, 1997 WL 186860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-adams-orctapp-1997.