State v. . Adams

65 N.C. 537
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 5, 1871
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 65 N.C. 537 (State v. . Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . Adams, 65 N.C. 537 (N.C. 1871).

Opinion

Boyden, J.

The act of 1866, ch. 40, see. 5, enacts: “That in all cases where men and women, both, or one of whom were lately slaves, and are now emancipated, now cohabit together in the relation of husband and wife, the parties shall be deemed to have been lawfully married, as man and wife, at the time of the commencement of such cohabitation, although they may not have been married' in due form of law.”

This act, to all intents and purposes, rendered the parties thus cohabiting, man and wife, and devolved upon each of the parties the duties and responsibilities of the marriage state. It is true, that this same 5th section also imposes upon all persons, whose cohabitation has been thus ratified into a state of marriage, “ the duty of going before the Clerk of the Court of Pleas and Quarter Session, at his office, or before some Justice of the Peace, and to acknowledge the fact of such cohabitation, and the time of its commencement,” and a failure to perform this duty, is made an indictable misdemeanor; but the failure to perform this duty cannot avoid the marriage thus ratified by the act of 1866.

There is no error.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kelley v. Kelley
310 P.2d 328 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1957)
Wadsworth v. Brigham
266 P. 875 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1927)
Merrick v. Betts
101 N.E. 131 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1913)
Bettis v. Avery.
52 S.E. 584 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1905)
State v. . Melton
26 S.E. 933 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1897)
Jones v. . Hoggard
12 S.E. 907 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1891)
Branch v. . Walker
8 S.E. 896 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1889)
Baity v. . Cranfill
91 N.C. 293 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1884)
Long v. . Barnes
87 N.C. 329 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1882)
Daniel v. Sams
17 Fla. 487 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1880)
Nelson v. Williams
22 N.C. 117 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1838)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
65 N.C. 537, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-adams-nc-1871.