State v. Adams

204 S.W.3d 237, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1269, 2006 WL 2472879
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 29, 2006·No. No. ED 86908·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Terry R. Adams (hereinafter, “Defendant”) appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of one count of forgery, Section 570.090 RSMo (2000). The trial court sentenced Defendant, as a prior and persistent offender, to a term of fifteen years’ imprisonment. He claims the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress and introducing evidence of certain items at trial because those items were seized improperly.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Adams, 204 S.W.3d 237, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1269, 2006 WL 2472879 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

204 S.W.3d 237 (State v. Adams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adams v. State
271 S.W.3d 67 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)