State v. Adams

1 Houston 361
CourtSuperior Court of Delaware
DecidedNovember 5, 1872
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Houston 361 (State v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Adams, 1 Houston 361 (Del. Ct. App. 1872).

Opinion

James Adams and John Aiken were indicted and tried at this term of the Court for a conspiracy to break and enter the National Bank of Newark with the intent to rob it. The indictment contained five counts, each of which charged that they conspired together, and with divers other evil disposed persons whose names were unknown to the grand jury, to commit the crime alleged in it; and the conspiracy as alleged was proved by the testimony of two witnesses who fully admitted and stated that they were accomplices in it, and why they ultimately failed to accomplish their purpose of breaking and entering the bank with the intent alleged in the indictment. that the offense charged in the indictment consisted in the conspiracy or combination to do the unlawful act alleged in it, and the gist of that offense consisted in their agreement to commit the act, and it was complete as a conspiracy, and indictable as such, without the doing of any overt act whatever in the execution of the agreement, or the design with which it was entered into. But it was not true as contended for by the counsel for Aiken, that under the indictment and proof, one of the defendants could not be convicted or acquitted without the other, for if the jury should be satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that either of them conspired with the witnesses, Greenwalt and Miller, or either of them, to commit the act, he might be convicted, and the other might be acquitted.

Verdict — Adams guilty. Aiken not guilty.

*Page 363

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Houston 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-adams-delsuperct-1872.