State v. Adams

91 So. 3d 755, 2012 WL 593409, 2012 Ala. LEXIS 21
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedFebruary 24, 2012
Docket1100191
StatusPublished

This text of 91 So. 3d 755 (State v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Adams, 91 So. 3d 755, 2012 WL 593409, 2012 Ala. LEXIS 21 (Ala. 2012).

Opinion

MURDOCK, Justice.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied.

In denying the petition for the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Criminal Appeals’ opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT DENIED.

MALONE, C.J., and WOODALL, STUART, BOLIN, PARKER, and SHAW, JJ., concur. MAIN and WISE, JJ., recuse [756]*756themselves.*

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Horsley v. Horsley
280 So. 2d 155 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 So. 3d 755, 2012 WL 593409, 2012 Ala. LEXIS 21, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-adams-ala-2012.