State v. Acuapa
This text of State v. Acuapa (State v. Acuapa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
STATE OF DELAWARE, ) ) ) I.D.: 2406008689 v. ) ) ERICKSON URIBE ACUAPA ) ) Defendant. )
Submitted: July 1, 2025 Decided: July 24, 2025
ORDER On Defendant’s Motion for Modification/Reduction of Sentence
DENIED
This 24th day of July, 2025, upon consideration of the instant Motion for
Correction of an Illegal Sentence, under Superior Court Criminal Rule 35(b)1
brought by Defendant Erickson Uribe Acuapa (“Uribe Acuapa”), it appears to the
Court that:
1. On April 15, 2025, Uribe Acuapa pled guilty to Assault First Degree and
Reckless Endangering First Degree.2 He was subsequently sentenced on May
5, 2025 to ten (10) years at Level V, suspended after two (2) years for eighteen
(18) months at Level III for Assault First Degree and to five (5) years at Level
1 Docket Item (“D.I.”) 20. 2 D.I. 16. V suspended for eighteen (18) months at Level III for Reckless Endangering
First Degree.3
2. In the instant Motion, Uribe Acuapa moves this Court for a review of his
sentence under Rule 35(b) which allows the Court to “reduce a sentence of
imprisonment on a motion made within 90 days after the sentence is
imposed.”4 The Court will not consider repetitive requests for sentence
reductions.5 The Court has “broad discretion” to determine whether a
reduction of sentence is appropriate.6
3. The instant Motion is Uribe Acuapa’s first request for a sentence reduction
and was timely filed.7 He asks the Court to reduce his Assault First Degree
sentence to one (1) year at Level V, followed by two (2) years at Level III. 8
The Motion notes several factors as the basis for the sentence reduction
sought, including this being his first offense, his good behavior since
incarceration, and his established employment plans when he completes
incarceration.9
3 D.I. 19. 4 Del. Super. Ct. Crim. R. 35(b). 5 Id. 6 Hewlett v. State, 2014 WL 5020251, at *1 (Del. 2014). 7 Uribe Acuapa’s sentence was imposed on May 5, 2025, and his Motion was filed on July 1, 2025. See D.I. 19 and 20. 8 D.I. 20 ¶ 3. 9 Id. ¶¶ 4-7. 4. Assault First Degree has a minimum mandatory time of two (2) years.10
Therefore, when imposing Uribe Acuapa’s sentence, the Court was following
the statutorily enforced requirement. The Court has no authority to reduce a
sentence below a minimum-mandatory period. Additionally, Uribe Acuapa
signed his Plea Agreement forms which indicate that his Assault First Degree
charge comes with a minimum-mandatory sentence of two years. By signing
these forms, Uribe Acuapa represented to the Court that he understood the
minimum-mandatory sentence requirement.
5. For the above reason, the Court DENIES this Motion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Francis J. Jones, Jr. Francis J. Jones, Jr., Judge
cc: Original to the Prothonotary Brett Fallon, Deputy Attorney General Erickson Uribe Acuapa, JTVCC, SBI No. 01041795
10 See 11 Del. Code §§ 613, 4205(2).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Acuapa, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-acuapa-delsuperct-2025.