State v. Acton

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Acton

440 S.W.3d 560, 2014 WL 2739334, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 682

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 17, 2014·No. No. WD 76199·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Following a bench trial, Keith Acton was convicted in the Circuit Court of Clay County of the class A misdemeanor of child molestation. Acton appeals. He argues that the circuit court erred in excluding evidence of the victim’s false accusation of rape against another male; that the circuit court erred in excluding the videotape of the victim’s forensic interview as a prior inconsistent statement; and that the competent, credible evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Following a bench trial, Keith Acton was convicted in the Circuit Court of Clay County of the class A misdemeanor of child molestation. Acton appeals. He argues that the circuit court erred in excluding evidence of the victim’s false accusation of rape against another male; that the circuit court erred in excluding the videotape of the victim’s forensic interview as a prior inconsistent statement; and that the competent, credible evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Acton, 440 S.W.3d 560, 2014 WL 2739334, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 682 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

440 S.W.3d 560 (State v. Acton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.