State v. Acosta
664 So. 2d 967, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 645, 1995 WL 36155
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 1, 1995
DocketNo. 94-0055
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 664 So. 2d 967 (State v. Acosta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Acosta, 664 So. 2d 967, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 645, 1995 WL 36155 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).
Opinion
The trial court dismissed this case after concluding that a statutory provision under which defendant was charged was facially unconstitutional. In a companion case, State v. Marcolini, 664 So.2d 963 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995) we determined that the same provision was facially constitutional. We therefore reverse this case for the reasons expressed in Marcolini.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Marcolini v. State
673 So. 2d 3 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
664 So. 2d 967, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 645, 1995 WL 36155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-acosta-fladistctapp-1995.