State v. Achter

521 S.W.2d 761, 1975 Mo. App. LEXIS 1968
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 3, 1975
DocketNo. 9675
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 521 S.W.2d 761 (State v. Achter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Achter, 521 S.W.2d 761, 1975 Mo. App. LEXIS 1968 (Mo. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

PER. CURIAM.

Leslie Allen Achter was convicted by a Mississippi County jury of burglary and stealing. The court found he was subject to prosecution under the Second Offender Act [six prior felony convictions1] and sentenced him to consecutive five-year sentences.

We have carefully read the transcript and the authorities cited by the parties in their briefs. The evidence is sufficient to support the jury’s verdict. We find no abuse of discretion in denying defendant’s motion for a continuance. Defendant was properly tried as a habitual criminal. We find no error in denying the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence. There was no error in refusing instructions tendered by the defendant since the instructions given fully and fairly covered the same subject matter. Although not properly preserved for our review we have considered and find no merit in the defendant’s contentions regarding a mental examination and the validity of a search warrant.

No error of law appears and an opinion would have no precedential value.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16, V.A. M.R.

Affirmed.

An concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Achter v. State
545 S.W.2d 83 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
521 S.W.2d 761, 1975 Mo. App. LEXIS 1968, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-achter-moctapp-1975.