State v. Acampora

184 A.3d 1215, 329 Conn. 903
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedJune 6, 2018
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 184 A.3d 1215 (State v. Acampora) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Acampora, 184 A.3d 1215, 329 Conn. 903 (Colo. 2018).

Opinion

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 176 Conn.App. 202, 169 A.3d 820 (2018), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the defendant waived the issue of whether the trial court was required to canvass him regarding his right to self-representation prior to February 23, 2012?

"2. If the answer to the first question is no, did the trial court improperly fail to canvass the defendant regarding his right to self-representation prior to February 23, 2012?

"3. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court's February 23, 2012 canvass was sufficient and that the defendant effectively waived his right to counsel?"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Joseph A.
336 Conn. 247 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
184 A.3d 1215, 329 Conn. 903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-acampora-conn-2018.