State v. Acacio

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Acacio. Read the opinion of the Court — 140 Haw. 92
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided December 21, 2016·No. SCWC-13-0000132·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-13-0002125 20-DEC-2016 03:01 PM

SCWC-13-0002125

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

RENE UMBERGER, MIKE NAKACHI, KA#IMI KAUPIKO, WILLIE KAUPIKO, CONSERVATION COUNCIL FOR HAWAI#I, THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, Petitioners/Plaintiffs-Appellants,

vs.

DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES, STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-13-0002125; CIVIL NO. 12-1-2625-10 JHC)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioners/Plaintiffs-Appellants’ Application for

Writ of Certiorari, filed on November 10, 2016, is hereby

accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument. The parties

will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding scheduling.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, December 20, 2016.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Acacio, (haw 2016).

State v. Acacio (State v. Acacio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.