State v. Abeyta
Opinion
This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer- generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
No. A-1-CA-40259
STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
RICKIE J. ABEYTA,
Defendant-Appellant.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CIBOLA COUNTY Amanda Sanchez Villalobos, District Court Judge
Raúl Torrez, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM Michael J. Thomas, Assistant Attorney General Albuquerque, NM
for Appellee
Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender Santa Fe, NM Steven J. Forsberg, Assistant Public Defender Albuquerque, NM
for Appellant
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DUFFY, Judge.
{1} Defendant appeals from the district court’s order revoking his probation. On appeal, in response to this Court’s first proposed summary disposition, Defendant argued that the district court proceedings revoking his probation violated his due process right to confrontation. This Court issued a second notice of proposed disposition, proposing to reverse the district court. Now, the State has filed a response to this second notice of proposed disposition and announced that it will not file a memorandum in opposition.
{2} Accordingly, we rely on the reasoning contained in our second notice of proposed disposition, and we reverse the revocation of Defendant’s probation and remand for further proceedings.
{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
MEGAN P. DUFFY, Judge
WE CONCUR:
J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
KRISTINA BOGARDUS, Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Abeyta (State v. Abeyta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.