State v. Abernathy

179 S.W.3d 384, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1812, 2005 WL 3288033
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 6, 2005
DocketED 85562
StatusPublished

This text of 179 S.W.3d 384 (State v. Abernathy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Abernathy, 179 S.W.3d 384, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1812, 2005 WL 3288033 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Hasani A. Abernathy (“Defendant”) appeals from a judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of possession of a controlled substance, a class C felony. The court sentenced Defendant to ten years in the. Missouri Department of Corrections, the execution of which was stayed pending Defendant’s participation in a long-term substance abuse program.

In his sole point on appeal, Defendant claims that the trial court erred in denying Defendant’s motion for judgment of acquittal because the State failed to establish that he possessed a controlled substance beyond a reasonable doubt. We find no error and affirm.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the *385 detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
179 S.W.3d 384, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1812, 2005 WL 3288033, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-abernathy-moctapp-2005.