State v. Abbott

20 Vt. 537
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided April 15, 1848·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Redfield, J.

The only question, raised in the present case, is in regard to the sufficiency of the indictment. It is for a violation of the statute against maiming, or wounding, cattle. The objection [538] is, that the defendant is charged with wounding a steer, without alleging, that a steer is cattle, or other beast,” — which are the words of the statute. It is very possible, that some of the old cases may have adopted a degree of strictness, equal to this, even. But no modern case of this character existSj it is believed; but the contrary has often been decided.

Judgment that the defendant take nothing by his exceptions, or motion in arrest of judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Abbott, 20 Vt. 537 (Vt. 1848).

20 Vt. 537 (State v. Abbott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Town of Wolcott v. Stickles
82 A. 572 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1912)
Wilson v. Union Mutual Fire Ins.
55 A. 662 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1903)
Robertson v. State
1 Tex. Ct. App. 311 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1876)
Parchman v. State
44 Tex. 192 (Texas Supreme Court, 1875)
Banks v. State
28 Tex. 644 (Texas Supreme Court, 1866)