State v. Aaron L.
835 A.2d 474, 266 Conn. 924, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 508
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 79 Conn. App. 397 (AC 22450), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that: (1) there was sufficient evidence to allow the admission of a certain 1992 incident as uncharged misconduct; and (2) the statements of the defendant’s two year old daughter to her mother were admissible under residual exceptions to the hearsay rule?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Aaron L., 835 A.2d 474, 266 Conn. 924, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 508 (Colo. 2003).
835 A.2d 474 (State v. Aaron L.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Aaron L.
865 A.2d 1135 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2005)