State v. Aaron L.
835 A.2d 474, 266 Conn. 924, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 508
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedNovember 4, 2003
DocketSC 17089
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 835 A.2d 474 (State v. Aaron L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Aaron L., 835 A.2d 474, 266 Conn. 924, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 508 (Colo. 2003).
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 79 Conn. App. 397 (AC 22450), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that: (1) there was sufficient evidence to allow the admission of a certain 1992 incident as uncharged misconduct; and (2) the statements of the defendant’s two year old daughter to her mother were admissible under residual exceptions to the hearsay rule?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Aaron L.
865 A.2d 1135 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2005)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
835 A.2d 474, 266 Conn. 924, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 508, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-aaron-l-conn-2003.