State v. AARHUS

234 P.3d 209, 169 Wash. 2d 1006
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 7, 2010
Docket84140-3
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 234 P.3d 209 (State v. AARHUS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. AARHUS, 234 P.3d 209, 169 Wash. 2d 1006 (Wash. 2010).

Opinion

234 P.3d 209 (2010)

STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Jo Wayne AARHUS, Petitioner.

No. 84140-3.

Supreme Court of Washington.

July 7, 2010.

ORDER

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Madsen and Justices Alexander, Chambers, Fairhurst and Stephens, considered at its July 6, 2010, Motion Calendar, whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b), and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the Petition for Review is granted and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals Division One for reconsideration in light of State of Washington v. Hall, 168 Wash.2d 726, 230 P.3d 1048 (2010).

For the Court /s/ Madsen, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

*210

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. HUAN CONG HUYNH
234 P.3d 209 (Washington Supreme Court, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
234 P.3d 209, 169 Wash. 2d 1006, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-aarhus-wash-2010.