State v. A. S.

247 P.3d 1278, 240 Or. App. 809, 2011 Ore. App. LEXIS 166
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided February 16, 2011·No. M1004007; A145521·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant appeals an order committing her to the Mental Health Division for a period of time not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. At the commitment hearing, the court indicated that “there is clear and convincing evidence in my mind that [appellant] will not soon be able to safely survive by meeting her basic needs if she is discharged.” On appeal, we review the record to determine whether there is legally sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s determination. A discussion of the facts would not benefit the bench, the bar, or the public. The state concedes that the evidence in the record is legally insufficient to support the court’s determination. We agree and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. A. S., 247 P.3d 1278, 240 Or. App. 809, 2011 Ore. App. LEXIS 166 (Or. Ct. App. 2011).

247 P.3d 1278 (State v. A. S.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In the Matter of As
247 P.3d 1278 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2011)