State v. A. P. C. (In re A. P. C.)

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. A. P. C. (In re A. P. C.)

423 P.3d 176, 293 Or. App. 113

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided July 25, 2018·No. A164227·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

*114Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him to the custody of the Mental Health Division for a period not to exceed 180 days. See ORS 426.130. In his only assignment of error, appellant argues that the record lacked sufficient evidence that, due to a mental disorder, appellant was a danger to himself or unable to provide for his basic needs. The state concedes that "the evidence is insufficient to establish that, because of his mental disorder, appellant was a danger to self or unable to provide for his basic needs" and that the judgment of commitment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state's concession, and reverse.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

*114Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him to the custody of the Mental Health Division for a period not to exceed 180 days. See ORS 426.130. In his only assignment of error, appellant argues that the record lacked sufficient evidence that, due to a mental disorder, appellant was a danger to himself or unable to provide for his basic needs. The state concedes that "the evidence is insufficient to establish that, because of his mental disorder, appellant was a danger to self or unable to provide for his basic needs" and that the judgment of commitment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state's concession, and reverse.

Reversed.

State v. A. P. C. (In re A. P. C.), 423 P.3d 176, 293 Or. App. 113 (Or. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

423 P.3d 176 (State v. A. P. C. (In re A. P. C.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related