State v. A. L.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. A. L.

184 P.3d 1224, 220 Or. App. 127, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 650

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided May 14, 2008·No. 070363210; A135542·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The trial court found that appellant has a mental disorder and, because of that mental disorder, is a danger to herself. The court entered an order of involuntary commitment on that basis. Appellant argues on appeal that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence that she is a danger to herself. The state concedes the point and agrees that the order of involuntary commitment should be reversed. On de novo review, we agree that the evidence is insufficient to support the commitment.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

The trial court found that appellant has a mental disorder and, because of that mental disorder, is a danger to herself. The court entered an order of involuntary commitment on that basis. Appellant argues on appeal that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence that she is a danger to herself. The state concedes the point and agrees that the order of involuntary commitment should be reversed. On de novo review, we agree that the evidence is insufficient to support the commitment.

Reversed.

State v. A. L., 184 P.3d 1224, 220 Or. App. 127, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 650 (Or. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

184 P.3d 1224 (State v. A. L.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.