State v. A. L.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. A. L.

184 P.3d 1224, 220 Or. App. 127, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 650

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedMay 14, 2008

Docket070363210; A135542

StatusPublished

This text of 184 P.3d 1224 (State v. A. L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. A. L., 184 P.3d 1224, 220 Or. App. 127, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 650 (Or. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The trial court found that appellant has a mental disorder and, because of that mental disorder, is a danger to herself. The court entered an order of involuntary commitment on that basis. Appellant argues on appeal that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence that she is a danger to herself. The state concedes the point and agrees that the order of involuntary commitment should be reversed. On de novo review, we agree that the evidence is insufficient to support the commitment.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

The trial court found that appellant has a mental disorder and, because of that mental disorder, is a danger to herself. The court entered an order of involuntary commitment on that basis. Appellant argues on appeal that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence that she is a danger to herself. The state concedes the point and agrees that the order of involuntary commitment should be reversed. On de novo review, we agree that the evidence is insufficient to support the commitment.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

184 P.3d 1224, 220 Or. App. 127, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-a-l-orctapp-2008.