State v. A. H.
This text of 476 P.3d 529 (State v. A. H.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Submitted October 2, reversed November 18, 2020
In the Matter of A. H., a Person Alleged to have Mental Illness. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. A. H., Appellant. Multnomah County Circuit Court 20CC00624; A173580 476 P3d 529
Monica M. Herranz, Judge pro tempore. Alexander C. Cambier and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Christopher Page, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and James, Judge, and Kamins, Judge. PER CURIAM Reversed. Cite as 307 Or App 618 (2020) 619
PER CURIAM Appellant seeks reversal of an order committing him to the custody of the Mental Health Division for a period not to exceed 180 days on the grounds that he is unable to provide for his basic personal needs and is not receiving care necessary to avoid serious physical harm in the near future. See ORS 426.005(1)(f)(B). He challenges the sufficiency of the state’s evidence to support the court’s basic-needs deter- mination. The state concedes that the record is legally insuf- ficient in that regard and that the commitment order should be reversed. We agree and accept the state’s concession. Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
476 P.3d 529, 307 Or. App. 618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-a-h-orctapp-2020.