State v. $126,053.00 U.S. Currency, Cellular & Radar Detector

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. $126,053.00 U.S. Currency, Cellular & Radar Detector

595 So. 2d 1157, 1992 La. LEXIS 1412, 1992 WL 73095

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedApril 10, 1992

DocketNo. 92-CC-0353

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 595 So. 2d 1157 (State v. $126,053.00 U.S. Currency, Cellular & Radar Detector) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. $126,053.00 U.S. Currency, Cellular & Radar Detector, 595 So. 2d 1157, 1992 La. LEXIS 1412, 1992 WL 73095 (La. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Granted and remanded to the district court which is ordered to conduct an immediate evidentiary hearing on the forfeiture and to decide whether the state’s delay in filing a forfeiture proceeding or in holding a forfeiture trial violated the relator’s state or federal rights to due process of law in light of United States v. $8,850, 461 U.S. 555, 76 L.Ed.2d 143, 103 S.Ct. 2005 (1983); United States v. Banco Cafetero Panama, 797 F.2d 1154 (2d Cir.1986); see also D.B. Smith, Prosecution and Defense of Forfeiture Cases § 12.01 et seq. discussing undue delay in seeking forfeiture generally. Otherwise Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Granted and remanded to the district court which is ordered to conduct an immediate evidentiary hearing on the forfeiture and to decide whether the state’s delay in filing a forfeiture proceeding or in holding a forfeiture trial violated the relator’s state or federal rights to due process of law in light of United States v. $8,850, 461 U.S. 555, 76 L.Ed.2d 143, 103 S.Ct. 2005 (1983); United States v. Banco Cafetero Panama, 797 F.2d 1154 (2d Cir.1986); see also D.B. Smith, Prosecution and Defense of Forfeiture Cases § 12.01 et seq. discussing undue delay in seeking forfeiture generally. Otherwise Denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

595 So. 2d 1157, 1992 La. LEXIS 1412, 1992 WL 73095, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-12605300-us-currency-cellular-radar-detector-la-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack