State, Use of Killen v. Carters' Ex'r

Superior Court of Delaware

State, Use of Killen v. Carters' Ex'r

1 Del. 325

DecidedJuly 5, 1834

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Del. 325 (State, Use of Killen v. Carters' Ex'r) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State, Use of Killen v. Carters' Ex'r, 1 Del. 325 (Del. Ct. App. 1834).

Pincite

Opinion

Debt on an administration bond. Narr suggesting breaches. Plea's—payment, non est factum, plene administravit and act of limitations. 1

To repel the plea of the statute of limitations the plff. was about to prove the infancy of Mrs. Killen; but it was objected to, and

The court stopt him. There is no replication of infancy to the plea of the statute, and unless infancy be specially replied it cannot be relied on or proved at the trial.

The plff. suffered a nonsuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Debt on an administration bond. Narr suggesting breaches. Plea's—payment, non est factum, plene administravit and act of limitations. 1

To repel the plea of the statute of limitations the plff. was about to prove the infancy of Mrs. Killen; but it was objected to, and

The court stopt him. There is no replication of infancy to the plea of the statute, and unless infancy be specially replied it cannot be relied on or proved at the trial.

The plff. suffered a nonsuit.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Del. 325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-use-of-killen-v-carters-exr-delsuperct-1834.