Home/Louisiana Court of Appeal/STATE, THROUGH DOTD v. Scramuzza

STATE, THROUGH DOTD v. Scramuzza

594 So. 2d 521
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided January 31, 1992·No. 91-CA-163·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

594 So.2d 521 (1992)

STATE of Louisiana Through the DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION & DEVELOPMENT
v.
Alfred SCRAMUZZA, et al.

No. 91-CA-163.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit.

January 31, 1992.

*522 Ronald J. Bertrand, Rayne, for plaintiff-appellant.

Thomas Lee, Harahan, Mack E. Barham, Robert E. Arceneaux, Barham & Markle, PLC, New Orleans, for defendants-appellees.

Before FINK, J. Pro Tem., and KLIEBERT and BOWES, JJ.

ELORA C. FINK, Judge Pro Tem.

For the reason assigned this day in no. 91-CA-162, State of Louisiana, Department of Transportation & Development v. Scramuzza, 594 So.2d 517 consolidated herewith, the appeal is dismissed and the case is remanded.

APPEAL DISMISSED, CASE REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

STATE, THROUGH DOTD v. Scramuzza, 594 So. 2d 521 (La. Ct. App. 1992).

594 So. 2d 521 (STATE, THROUGH DOTD v. Scramuzza) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Petranick v. White Consolidated Industries
857 So. 2d 1232 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2003)
Eubanks v. Salmon
726 So. 2d 430 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1999)
STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. Scramuzza
692 So. 2d 1024 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1997)
STATE DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. v. Scramuzza
673 So. 2d 1249 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1996)