State Tax Commission v. Shor

53 A.D.2d 814, 385 N.Y.S.2d 290, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13634
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 1, 1976
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 53 A.D.2d 814 (State Tax Commission v. Shor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Tax Commission v. Shor, 53 A.D.2d 814, 385 N.Y.S.2d 290, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13634 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New [815]*815York County, entered October 15, 1975, directing the turnover of certain escrowed funds to the State Tax Commission, the Chase Manhattan Bank, and 480 Park Avenue Corporation and discharging the bank from all liability for the escrowed funds upon compliance with the court’s order, unanimously affirmed. Respondents State Tax Commission, Chase Manhattan and 480 Park Avenue shall recover of appellant one bill of $40 costs and disbursements of this appeal. The facts underlying this appeal are set forth in 84 Misc 2d 161. The issue presented is whether the stock of a co-operative apartment and its accompanying proprietary lease, owned by respondent Shor, constitutes realty or personalty for purposes of determining the perfection and priority of creditors’ liens thereon. As a majority of this court observed in Silverman v Alcoa Plaza Assoc. (37 AD2d 166, 172) "a proprietary lease is no different from any other type of lease. It is personal property. Co-operative apartment stock is nevertheless stock, like any other stock in a corporation”. The corporation is sole owner of the land and building. It is the stock and not the lease, which is sold. And stock ownership is a prerequisite to procuring a lease. Thus, as Special Term noted "whatever rights a co-operative stockholder has in a co-operative are derived from the stock and not the proprietary lease.” (84 Misc 2d 161, 164.) It necessarily follows then that an interest in a co-operative apartment is not a chattel real within the meaning of CPLR 105 (subd [r]) and is therefore not subject to CPLR 5203, which addresses itself to priorities and liens upon real property. Concur—Markewich, J. P., Silverman, Capozzoli, Nunez and Yesawich, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sansol Industries, Inc. v. 345 East 56th Street Owners, Inc.
159 Misc. 2d 822 (New York Supreme Court, 1993)
Linden Hill No. 1 Cooperative Corp. v. Kleiner
124 Misc. 2d 1001 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1984)
DuPont v. Southern Nat. Bank of Houston, Texas
575 F. Supp. 849 (S.D. Texas, 1983)
Clearview Gardens Fourth Corp. v. Michael
110 Misc. 2d 1022 (New York Supreme Court, 1981)
Suarez v. Rivercross Tenants' Corp.
107 Misc. 2d 135 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
53 A.D.2d 814, 385 N.Y.S.2d 290, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13634, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-tax-commission-v-shor-nyappdiv-1976.