State Securities Co. v. Federated Mutual Implement & Hardware Insurance

Eighth Circuit

State Securities Co. v. Federated Mutual Implement & Hardware Insurance

308 F.2d 452

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedOctober 9, 1962

DocketNo. 16880

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 308 F.2d 452 (State Securities Co. v. Federated Mutual Implement & Hardware Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Securities Co. v. Federated Mutual Implement & Hardware Insurance, 308 F.2d 452 (8th Cir. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment for the defendant (appellee) in this diversity case governed by Nebraska law and tried to Judge John W. Delehant without a jury. He has written an exhaustive opinion, reported in D.C., 204 F.Supp. 207, to which we can add nothing. That opinion and the briefs of the parties have convinced us that the judgment appealed from represents, at the very least, a permissible conclusion with respect to a doubtful question of Nebraska law, which this Court will not reverse. Homolla v. Gluck, 8 Cir., 248 F.2d 731, 733; Weiby v. Farmers Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 8 Cir., 273 F.2d 327, 331; Village of Brooten v. Cudahy Packing Company, 8 Cir., 291 F.2d 284, 301.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment for the defendant (appellee) in this diversity case governed by Nebraska law and tried to Judge John W. Delehant without a jury. He has written an exhaustive opinion, reported in D.C., 204 F.Supp. 207, to which we can add nothing. That opinion and the briefs of the parties have convinced us that the judgment appealed from represents, at the very least, a permissible conclusion with respect to a doubtful question of Nebraska law, which this Court will not reverse. Homolla v. Gluck, 8 Cir., 248 F.2d 731, 733; Weiby v. Farmers Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 8 Cir., 273 F.2d 327, 331; Village of Brooten v. Cudahy Packing Company, 8 Cir., 291 F.2d 284, 301.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

308 F.2d 452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-securities-co-v-federated-mutual-implement-hardware-insurance-ca8-1962.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack