State Securities Co. v. Federated Mutual Implement & Hardware Insurance

Eighth Circuit

State Securities Co. v. Federated Mutual Implement & Hardware Insurance

308 F.2d 452

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided October 9, 1962·No. No. 16880·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment for the defendant (appellee) in this diversity case governed by Nebraska law and tried to Judge John W. Delehant without a jury. He has written an exhaustive opinion, reported in D.C., 204 F.Supp. 207, to which we can add nothing. That opinion and the briefs of the parties have convinced us that the judgment appealed from represents, at the very least, a permissible conclusion with respect to a doubtful question of Nebraska law, which this Court will not reverse. Homolla v. Gluck, 8 Cir., 248 F.2d 731, 733; Weiby v. Farmers Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 8 Cir., 273 F.2d 327, 331; Village of Brooten v. Cudahy Packing Company, 8 Cir., 291 F.2d 284, 301.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment for the defendant (appellee) in this diversity case governed by Nebraska law and tried to Judge John W. Delehant without a jury. He has written an exhaustive opinion, reported in D.C., 204 F.Supp. 207, to which we can add nothing. That opinion and the briefs of the parties have convinced us that the judgment appealed from represents, at the very least, a permissible conclusion with respect to a doubtful question of Nebraska law, which this Court will not reverse. Homolla v. Gluck, 8 Cir., 248 F.2d 731, 733; Weiby v. Farmers Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 8 Cir., 273 F.2d 327, 331; Village of Brooten v. Cudahy Packing Company, 8 Cir., 291 F.2d 284, 301.

Affirmed.

State Securities Co. v. Federated Mutual Implement & Hardware Insurance, 308 F.2d 452 (8th Cir. 1962).

Pincite

308 F.2d 452 (State Securities Co. v. Federated Mutual Implement & Hardware Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related