State Sav. Loan & Trust Co. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.
This text of 63 F.2d 482 (State Sav. Loan & Trust Co. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal involves deficiency income tax assessments for the years 1926^ 1927, and 1928. Petitioner was taxed as trustee under a trust indenture created by one Gardner and his wife for the benefit of their nine grandchildren. The issues arise out of and are determined by a construction of the trust agreement. It is petitioner’s contention (1) that the trust instrument created not one, hut nine separate trusts, one for each of their nine grandchildren respectively, and (2) that petitioner, as trustee, was unqualifiedly required to pay over the income to the beneficiaries. The board held that but one trust had been created and that the income was taxable to the trustee because be was endowed with discretion as to distribution of the trust income to the beneficiaries.
The Revenue Act of 1926, § 219 (a), 26 USCA § 960 note, provides that the tax shall be assessed upon income of property held in trust when such income may, in the discretion of the fiduciary, either be distributed to the beneficiaries or accumulated.
The trustee made no distribution of income during 3926-1928, the years in question. Only one income tax return was filed for the trust in both 1926 and 1927, but nine separate returns were filed in 1928.
Material portions of the trust indenture are set forth in the margin verbatim. 1
*484 The intention of the settlors as disclosed by the provisions of the instrument, is largely controlling in the construction of the indenture. Huhbell v. Burnet (C. C. A.) 46 F.(2d) 446; Stark v. U. S. (D. C.) 14 F.(2d) 616; Carnahan v. Peabody (D. C.) 29 F.(2d) 412; Highland Park Mfg. Co. v. Steele (C. C. A.) 232 F. 10; Mercer v. Buchanan (C. C.) 132 F. 501.
It seems to us that the settlors intended to create but one comprehensive trust in which each of the beneficiaries was to have a one-ninth beneficial interest. Likewise, it seems rather clear that the net income derived from said trust estate was to be distributed to the henefieiari.es only as in the trustee’s judgment it was deemed best to do so.
The terminology of the trust instrument indicative of a single trust is: “The trust fund,” “the body of said trust estate,” “the trust estate,” “one-third of the trust estate in which said grandchild has a beneficial interest,” “the trust agreement,” and “the whole of that part of the trust estate in which said heir has a beneficial interest.” ' The only provision which might be interpreted as refuting this evidence is the following: “Any beneficiary under this agreement * * * shall have the right to designate as trustee of that part of said trust fund in which they are interested, any trust company, * * * the trustee * * * shall deliver to the trust company so named * * * all assets of every kind * • * belonging to that part of said trust estate in which the beneficiary making-the designation is entitled to the income, and the trustee shall make proper assignments and conveyances necessary for the complete transfer to the new trustee of all assets in its possession in which the beneficiary making such designation then has a beneficial interest * *
There is nothing to show that any beneficiary ever made use of this provision. It is possible that if a beneficiary elected to avail himself of this right, he would have caused a severance of the trust estate as to his interest, hut it is not necessary for us now to consider that contingency.
The fact that for two years the trustee so interpreted the instrument is somewhat persuasive.
The trustee was given discretion as to the distribution of the income. Note the follow *485 ing provision of the indenture: “Said trustee shall pay all or part of the net income on the trust estate created for the education, comfort and support of said grandchildren whenever m the judgment of said trustee it is for the best interest of said grandchildren or any of them so to do.”
_ ll he order of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed.
That the said parties of tho first part for and in consideration of tho promises and agreements hereinafter mentioned on the part of said party of the second part to ho performed, * * * have transferred, assigned and delivered to said Trustee, * * * 80S and 811 shares * * * of tho common stock of tho Gardner Governor Company, * * * said securities and stock to be held by said party of tho second part and its successor or successors in trust, for tho folio-wing uses and purposes.
Said trustee hereunder shall receive and hold said property to it hereby assigned and transferred in its own name and shall * * * decide all questions that may * * * arise by reason of its ownership of said property or of any other money, property or securities that may hereafter bo added to the trust fund hereby created, keeping all moneys coming into its possession from the body of said trust estate by reason of the sale of said securities or other property it may at any time hold in connection with this trust, at'all times invested * * *.
II. is understood and agreed that said parties of the first part are creating the trust estate provided by this agreement for the equal benefit of their grandchildren, Helen G. Rogers, Eleanor Rogers, Edward A. Rogers, Katharine G. Gardner, J, Willis Gardner II, Joseph E. Gardner, Stephen B. Botsford, Robert G. Botsford, Peter Fleischmann, and that all directions herein given for the payment of income or body of the trust estate shall be subject to tho provision that each of said grandchildren have an equal beneficial interest in the trust- estate hereby created and in the not income produced by said interest and that all provisions hereinafter made for the payment of income and body of the trust estate to said grandchildren and to those who may represent them after their decease, shall have reference* only to the interest which said grandchildren had in and to the body of tho trust estate and the income therein.
Said trustee shall pay all or part of the net income on the trust estate hereby created for the education, comfort and support of said grandchildren whenever in the judgment of said trustee it is for the best interest of said grandchildren or any of them so to do.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
63 F.2d 482, 3 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 1054, 12 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 228, 1933 U.S. App. LEXIS 3468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-sav-loan-trust-co-v-commissioner-of-int-rev-ca7-1933.