State on Relation of W. H. Howerton v. . S. McD. Tate

66 N.C. 431
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 5, 1872·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

RodMAN,- J.

The- only question in this case is whether the Clerk of Rowan Superior Court coiild issue a summons to be served in Buncombe Superior Court. The summons was dated 14th November 1871.

The Judge below'-, thought the Clerk had no such right, and dismissed the action. We concur with His Honor.

The practice is regulated by the Act of 1870-71, ch. 4% which was ratified on- the 25th of January- 1871, and says, “that the summons shall be signed by the Clerk of the Superior Court having jurisdiction to try the action.”

PjER'CuEfAM. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State on Relation of W. H. Howerton v. . S. McD. Tate, 66 N.C. 431 (N.C. 1872).

66 N.C. 431 (State on Relation of W. H. Howerton v. . S. McD. Tate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Smith v. Bosworth
117 S.E.2d 610 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1960)
Davison v. West Oxford Land Co.
24 S.E. 14 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1896)
Moore v. N. C. Railroad
67 N.C. 209 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1872)
Moore v. . R. R.
67 N.C. 209 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1872)