State on Relation of W. H. Howerton v. . S. McD. Tate

66 N.C. 431
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 5, 1872
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 66 N.C. 431 (State on Relation of W. H. Howerton v. . S. McD. Tate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State on Relation of W. H. Howerton v. . S. McD. Tate, 66 N.C. 431 (N.C. 1872).

Opinion

RodMAN,- J.

The- only question in this case is whether the Clerk of Rowan Superior Court coiild issue a summons to be served in Buncombe Superior Court. The summons was dated 14th November 1871.

The Judge below'-, thought the Clerk had no such right, and dismissed the action. We concur with His Honor.

The practice is regulated by the Act of 1870-71, ch. 4% which was ratified on- the 25th of January- 1871, and says, “that the summons shall be signed by the Clerk of the Superior Court having jurisdiction to try the action.”

PjER'CuEfAM. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Smith v. Bosworth
117 S.E.2d 610 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1960)
Davison v. West Oxford Land Co.
24 S.E. 14 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1896)
Moore v. N. C. Railroad
67 N.C. 209 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1872)
Moore v. . R. R.
67 N.C. 209 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1872)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
66 N.C. 431, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-on-relation-of-w-h-howerton-v-s-mcd-tate-nc-1872.