State Of Washington v. Shannon Hatton

CourtCourt of Appeals of Washington
DecidedDecember 14, 2020
Docket80447-2
StatusUnpublished

This text of State Of Washington v. Shannon Hatton (State Of Washington v. Shannon Hatton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Of Washington v. Shannon Hatton, (Wash. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 80447-2-I Respondent, DIVISION ONE v. UNPUBLISHED OPINION SHANNON D. HATTON,

Appellant.

PER CURIAM — Shannon Hatton was convicted by a jury of first degree

unlawful possession of a firearm, violation of the Uniform Controlled Substances

Act (VUCSA), chapter 69.50 RCW, and physical control while under the

influence. He challenges the firearm conviction, contending that the mandatory

impound and inventory search of his vehicle violated article I, section 7 of the

Washington Constitution. The State concedes that the conviction must be

vacated based on the Washington Supreme Court’s opinion in State v. Villela,

194 Wn.2d 451, 450 P.3d 170 (2019). In response to the State’s concession,

Hatton has withdrawn his sole remaining claim of error based on racial

disproportionality in jury selection. No. 80447-2-I/2

We accept the State’s concession. We affirm Hatton’s VUCSA and

physical control convictions. We dismiss the firearm conviction and remand to

the trial court for resentencing.

FOR THE COURT:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Villela
450 P.3d 170 (Washington Supreme Court, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State Of Washington v. Shannon Hatton, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-washington-v-shannon-hatton-washctapp-2020.