State Of Washington v. Richard William Trainer

Court of Appeals of Washington·Decided July 7, 2014·No. 70458-3·Unpublished

Opinion

(-

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 70458-3-1 Respondent, DIVISION ONE v.

UNPUBLISHED OPINION RICHARD WILLIAM TRAINER, FILED: JUL 7 2014 Appellant.

Per Curiam -- Richard Trainer appeals his conviction for attempted first degree

theft, arguing that the trial court erred in instructing the jury that it had a "duty to return a

verdict of guilty" if it found all the elements of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt.

This argument is controlled by our decision in State v. Ryan P. Moore, Wn. App.

, 318 P.3d 296 (2014) and the cases cited therein.

Affirmed.

For the court:

_-** -,•;... CO O \S" in C/"- C' v o *~T^ ~-™ -m—»

•71'-'J So *$££

!n~~~'- r-^

—3

v_j ir: On)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Of Washington v. Richard William Trainer, (Wash. Ct. App. 2014).

State Of Washington v. Richard William Trainer (State Of Washington v. Richard William Trainer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Moore
318 P.3d 296 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2014)