State Of Washington v. Raymond Allan Elliot
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
STATE OF WASHINGTON, DIVISION ONE
Respondent,
No. 71033-8-1
v.
UNPUBLISHED OPINION
RAYMOND ELLIOTT,
Appellant. FILED: FEB 1 7 2015
PER CURIAM - Raymond Elliott appeals the sentence imposed following Si >-
-n p
rn
his conviction for second degree burglary. He contends, and the State c3
concedes, that his offender score should have been 12 instead of 13. The _^
parties also agree that the standard range is the same whether the score is 12 or as
13. In such circumstances, the scoring error is harmless. State v. Arao. 81 Wn.
App. 552, 569, 915 P.2d 1103 (1996) (error in calculating offender score was harmless where standard range would be the same under proper score); State v. Priest. 147 Wn. App. 662, 673, 196 P.3d 763 (2008). Nevertheless, because the incorrect judgment and sentence should be corrected, we remand solely for the court to correct the offender score on the judgment and sentence.
Remanded for correction of the judgment and sentence.
FOR THE COURT:
)<e^(As^<s~
Oak, J y
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State Of Washington v. Raymond Allan Elliot (State Of Washington v. Raymond Allan Elliot) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.