State Of Washington v. Raymond Allan Elliot

Court of Appeals of Washington·Decided February 17, 2015·No. 71033-8·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

STATE OF WASHINGTON, DIVISION ONE

Respondent,

No. 71033-8-1

v.

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

RAYMOND ELLIOTT,

Appellant. FILED: FEB 1 7 2015

PER CURIAM - Raymond Elliott appeals the sentence imposed following Si >-

-n p

rn

his conviction for second degree burglary. He contends, and the State c3

concedes, that his offender score should have been 12 instead of 13. The _^

parties also agree that the standard range is the same whether the score is 12 or as

13. In such circumstances, the scoring error is harmless. State v. Arao. 81 Wn.

App. 552, 569, 915 P.2d 1103 (1996) (error in calculating offender score was harmless where standard range would be the same under proper score); State v. Priest. 147 Wn. App. 662, 673, 196 P.3d 763 (2008). Nevertheless, because the incorrect judgment and sentence should be corrected, we remand solely for the court to correct the offender score on the judgment and sentence.

Remanded for correction of the judgment and sentence.

FOR THE COURT:

)<e^(As^<s~

Oak, J y

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Of Washington v. Raymond Allan Elliot, (Wash. Ct. App. 2015).

State Of Washington v. Raymond Allan Elliot (State Of Washington v. Raymond Allan Elliot) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Argo
915 P.2d 1103 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1996)
State v. Priest
196 P.3d 763 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2008)
State v. Priest
147 Wash. App. 662 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2008)