State Of Washington v. Pablo Delacruz-perez

Court of Appeals of Washington·Decided May 18, 2015·No. 71710-3·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

STATE OF WASHINGTON, DIVISION ONE

Respondent,

No. 71710-3-

v.

PABLO DELACRUZ-PEREZ, UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Appellant.

FILED: MAY 1 8 2015

Per Curiam — Pablo Delacruz-Perez appeals his conviction for second

degree assault. He argues that the court erred in failing to enter written CrR 3.5 findings and conclusions and that we must remand for their entry. The trial court belatedly entered the findings and conclusions, however, and Delacruz-Perez has not alleged any prejudice from their delayed entry. Accordingly, he fails to demonstrate grounds for relief. State v. Gaddv, 114 Wn.App. 702, 705, 60 P.3d 116 (2002), affd, 152 Wn.2d 64, 93 P.3d 872 (2004).

Affirmed.

FOR THE COURT:

O

CO

V?

F\3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Of Washington v. Pablo Delacruz-perez, (Wash. Ct. App. 2015).

State Of Washington v. Pablo Delacruz-perez (State Of Washington v. Pablo Delacruz-perez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Gaddy
93 P.3d 872 (Washington Supreme Court, 2004)
State v. Gaddy
152 Wash. 2d 64 (Washington Supreme Court, 2004)
State v. Gaddy
60 P.3d 116 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2002)