State Of Washington, V. Micah Patlan Snyder

Court of Appeals of Washington·Decided November 1, 2021·No. 82564-0·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 82564-0-I Respondent, DIVISION ONE v.

MICAH PATLAN SNYDER, UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Appellant.

PER CURIAM — Micah Snyder appeals his convictions for two counts of third

degree domestic violence assault. He contends, and the State concedes, that the

portion of his judgment and sentence ordering him to provide a DNA 1 sample should be

stricken because he had already provided a sample pursuant to prior felony convictions.

RCW 43.43.754(4) (“If the Washington state patrol crime laboratory already has a DNA

sample from an individual for a qualifying offense, a subsequent submission is not

required to be submitted.”); State v. Houck, 9 Wn. App. 2d 636, 651 n.4, 446 P.3d 646

(2019); State v. Van Wolvelaere, 8 Wn. App. 2d 705, 710, 440 P.3d 1005 (2019).

We accept the State’s concession and remand to the trial court for a ministerial

order striking the order to submit a DNA sample.

1 Deoxyribonucleic acid.

Citations and pin cites are based on the Westlaw online version of the cited material. No. 82564-0-I/2

Remanded with instructions.

WE CONCUR:

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Of Washington, V. Micah Patlan Snyder, (Wash. Ct. App. 2021).

State Of Washington, V. Micah Patlan Snyder (State Of Washington, V. Micah Patlan Snyder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State of Washington v. Julia Elizabeth Tucker
440 P.3d 1005 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2019)
State Of Washington v. Anthony G. Houck
446 P.3d 646 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2019)