State Of Washington, V. Micah Patlan Snyder
This text of State Of Washington, V. Micah Patlan Snyder (State Of Washington, V. Micah Patlan Snyder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 82564-0-I Respondent, DIVISION ONE v.
MICAH PATLAN SNYDER, UNPUBLISHED OPINION
Appellant.
PER CURIAM — Micah Snyder appeals his convictions for two counts of third
degree domestic violence assault. He contends, and the State concedes, that the
portion of his judgment and sentence ordering him to provide a DNA 1 sample should be
stricken because he had already provided a sample pursuant to prior felony convictions.
RCW 43.43.754(4) (“If the Washington state patrol crime laboratory already has a DNA
sample from an individual for a qualifying offense, a subsequent submission is not
required to be submitted.”); State v. Houck, 9 Wn. App. 2d 636, 651 n.4, 446 P.3d 646
(2019); State v. Van Wolvelaere, 8 Wn. App. 2d 705, 710, 440 P.3d 1005 (2019).
We accept the State’s concession and remand to the trial court for a ministerial
order striking the order to submit a DNA sample.
1 Deoxyribonucleic acid.
Citations and pin cites are based on the Westlaw online version of the cited material. No. 82564-0-I/2
Remanded with instructions.
WE CONCUR:
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State Of Washington, V. Micah Patlan Snyder, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-washington-v-micah-patlan-snyder-washctapp-2021.