State Of Washington v. Martenis Demorreo Minnifield

Court of Appeals of Washington·Decided May 18, 2015·No. 70519-9·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

STATE OF WASHINGTON, DIVISION ONE Respondent, f-3 No. 70519-9-1 ,!•' <~~' on ~-i ' ' v. Z3Z. m,_ ysf ____ -—

—< •-n _ MARTENIS MINNIFIELD, UNPUBLISHED OPINION CP

Appellant. FILED: MAY 1 8 2015

Per Curiam — Martenis Minnifield appeals the sentence imposed

following his conviction for second degree assault. He contends the court erred

in imposing an exceptional sentence on that count absent notice of the State's

intent to seek an exceptional sentence on that count. But the State points out,

and Minnifeld does not dispute, that Minnifield's trial counsel proposed

instructions requiring the jury to consider an aggravating circumstance if it found

Minnifield guilty of second degree assault on either of the charged counts.

Accordingly, any error was invited and cannot be raised on appeal. State v.

Wininqs, 126 Wn. App. 75, 89, 107 P.3d 141 (2005); State v. Smith, 122 Wn.

App. 294, 299, 93 P.3d 206 (2004).

We affirm.

FOR THE COURT: 1V^^|

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Of Washington v. Martenis Demorreo Minnifield, (Wash. Ct. App. 2015).

State Of Washington v. Martenis Demorreo Minnifield (State Of Washington v. Martenis Demorreo Minnifield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Winings
107 P.3d 141 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2005)
State v. Smith
93 P.3d 206 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2004)
State v. Smith
122 Wash. App. 294 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2004)
State v. Winings
126 Wash. App. 75 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2005)