State Of Washington v. Leroy Parker

CourtCourt of Appeals of Washington
DecidedOctober 23, 2017
Docket75645-1
StatusUnpublished

This text of State Of Washington v. Leroy Parker (State Of Washington v. Leroy Parker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Of Washington v. Leroy Parker, (Wash. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 75645-1-1 Respondent, DIVISION ONE V.

LeROY PARKER, UNPUBLISHED OPINION --{ Appellant. FILED: October 23, 2017

PER CURIAM. LeRoy Parker appeals his convictions for felony violation

of a no-contact order, arguing that under State v. Case, 189 Wn. App. 422, 429,

358 P.3d 432(2015), the parties' stipulation to predicate convictions was

insufficient to support the current convictions. The State counters that Case was

wrongly decided and that, in any event, any error was either waived, invited, or

harmless.

While this appeal was pending, the Washington State Supreme Court

reversed Division Two's decision in Case. State v. Case, 187 Wn.2d 85, 384

P.3d 1140(2016). At our request, the parties filed supplemental briefs

addressing the impact of the Supreme Court's decision on this appeal. The

parties agree that the Supreme Court's decision is controlling here and defeats

Parker's arguments under the Court of Appeals' decision in Case.

In a Statement of Additional Grounds, Parker raises one argument

meriting discussion. He claims the prosecutor violated the trial court's rulings by

referencing alcohol and "Battered Wife Syndrome" or "BWS" during closing

argument. The record belies these claims. Although the court excluded No. 75645-1-1/2

testimony as to Parker's breath test results, the court ruled that "any questions as

to how much alcohol Mr. Parker had consumed was relevant as it related to his

memory of what had happened [1" RP 232-33. Parker fails to identify, nor did

our review of closing argument disclose, any violation of this ruling. Our review

of closing argument also failed to disclose any reference to "BWS" or "Battered

Wife Syndrome".

Affirmed.

For the court:

-2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Case
384 P.3d 1140 (Washington Supreme Court, 2016)
State v. Case
358 P.3d 432 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State Of Washington v. Leroy Parker, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-washington-v-leroy-parker-washctapp-2017.