State Of Washington v. Clyde Lee Mcknight

Court of Appeals of Washington·Decided January 16, 2018·No. 75666-4·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 75666-4-1

Respondent,

DIVISION ONE

V.

CLYDE LEE MCKNIGHT, UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Appellant. FILED: JAN 1 6 2018

PER CURIAM. Clyde McKnight appeals the sentence imposed following

his conviction for possession of cocaine. He contends, and the State concedes,

that the sentencing court violated State v. Bergstrom, 162 Wn.2d 87, 169 P.3d

816(2007) when it ignored his challenge to the inclusion of prior juvenile

convictions in his offender score. We accept the concession of error and concur

with the parties' assertion that McKnight is entitled to a new sentencing hearing

at which the State may attempt to prove the challenged criminal history. If the

State fails to carry its burden, the court must amend McKnight's offender score

and resentence him using the correct offender score and standard range.

Remanded for resentencing consistent with this opinion.

For the Court:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Of Washington v. Clyde Lee Mcknight, (Wash. Ct. App. 2018).

State Of Washington v. Clyde Lee Mcknight (State Of Washington v. Clyde Lee Mcknight) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Bergstrom
169 P.3d 816 (Washington Supreme Court, 2007)
State v. Bergstrom
162 Wash. 2d 87 (Washington Supreme Court, 2007)