State Of Washington v. Ashley E. Byrne
This text of State Of Washington v. Ashley E. Byrne (State Of Washington v. Ashley E. Byrne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE
STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) No. 69919-9-1 Appellant, es> —-5 c
v. i UNPUBLISHED OPINION
ASHLEY E. BYRNE, — .<--c
Respondent. FILED: AUG l l im Per Curiam —The State appeals an order suppressing evidence and dismissing a charge of manufacturing a controlled substance against Ashley Byrne. The parties
concede, and we agree, that the issue in this case is essentially identical to the issue
raised in a separate appeal involving Byrne's codefendant, Alex Buckingham. The latter
appeal has now been decided. Relying on State v. Reis, Wn. App. , 322 P.3d
1238 (2014), we held in State v. Buckingham, No. 69853-2, 2014 WL 1600587 (Wash.
Ct. App. Apr. 21, 2014) that the superior court erred in granting Buckingham's motion to
suppress and dismissing the charge against him. For the reasons set forth in
Buckingham, the superior court's decisions suppressing evidence and dismissing the
charge against Byrne are reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Reversed and remanded.
FOR THE COURT:
\*s*-irS\£^ £2 *^fy SlA^AiM^ Pj.^
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State Of Washington v. Ashley E. Byrne, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-washington-v-ashley-e-byrne-washctapp-2014.