State Of Washington v. Anthony Craig Lee
This text of State Of Washington v. Anthony Craig Lee (State Of Washington v. Anthony Craig Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 69638-6-1 Respondent, DIVISION ONE v.
ANTHONY C. LEE, UNPUBLISHED OPINION en o OCT I 4 2013 Appellant. FILED:
Per Curiam. — Anthony Lee appeals his convictions for second degree theft and
possession of cocaine. Citing Division Two's decision in State v. Knotek. 136 Wn. App.
412, 149 P.3d 676 (2006), he contends he was misadvised of the applicable maximum
sentence and that his guilty plea was therefore not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently
entered. He concedes, however, that this court reached a contrary conclusion in State v.
Kennar, 135 Wn. App. 68, 143 P.3d 326 (2006). Lee offers no persuasive basis to depart
from our decision in Kennar. We adhere to it and reject his challenge to his plea. Lee's
statement of additional grounds for review, which discusses a civil claim for unlawful
imprisonment, fails to articulate any basis for relief from his conviction and sentence.
Affirmed.
An. J. WE CONCUR:
L^l e..i * *z^Wy—r £
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State Of Washington v. Anthony Craig Lee, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-washington-v-anthony-craig-lee-washctapp-2013.