State of the Art Medical Products, Inc. v. Aries Medical, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

State of the Art Medical Products, Inc. v. Aries Medical, Inc.

707 A.2d 1140, 550 Pa. 570, 1998 Pa. LEXIS 829

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 15, 1998·No. Petition No. 204 Middle District Allocatur Docket 1997·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW this 15th day of April, 1998, the petition for allowance of appeal is granted, the Order of the Superior Court is reversed and the matter is remanded to the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County for consideration of the motion for judgment of non pros based upon Jacobs v. Hallo[571] ran, — Pa. -, 710 A.2d 1098 (Pa.1998) and Marino v. Hackman, — Pa. -, 710 A.2d 1108 (Pa.1998).

Petitioner’s application for leave to supplement pursuant to Rule 2501(a) is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW this 15th day of April, 1998, the petition for allowance of appeal is granted, the Order of the Superior Court is reversed and the matter is remanded to the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County for consideration of the motion for judgment of non pros based upon Jacobs v. Hallo[571] ran, — Pa. -, 710 A.2d 1098 (Pa.1998) and Marino v. Hackman, — Pa. -, 710 A.2d 1108 (Pa.1998).

Petitioner’s application for leave to supplement pursuant to Rule 2501(a) is denied.

State of the Art Medical Products, Inc. v. Aries Medical, Inc., 707 A.2d 1140, 550 Pa. 570, 1998 Pa. LEXIS 829 (Pa. 1998).

Pincite

707 A.2d 1140 (State of the Art Medical Products, Inc. v. Aries Medical, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related