State of Texas v. Martin Rodriguez

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 4, 2003
Docket07-03-00280-CR
StatusPublished

This text of State of Texas v. Martin Rodriguez (State of Texas v. Martin Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State of Texas v. Martin Rodriguez, (Tex. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

NO. 07-03-0280-CR


IN THE COURT OF APPEALS


FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


AT AMARILLO


PANEL A


SEPTEMBER 4, 2003



______________________________


THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLANT


V.


MARTIN RODRIGUEZ, APPELLEE


_________________________________


FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF PARMER COUNTY;


NO. 9269; HONORABLE BONNIE CLAYTON HEALD, JUDGE


_______________________________


Before JOHNSON, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

MEMORANDUM

Pending before this Court is the State's request to withdraw its notice of appeal by which it challenges the trial court's order granting appellee's motion to suppress. The request is signed by the Assistant County Attorney of Parmer County. Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 42.2(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the appeal is dismissed. Having dismissed the appeal at the request of the State, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.



Don H. Reavis

Justice



Do not publish.

P>

Accordingly, we now abate this appeal and remand the causes to the 251st District Court of Randall County for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever means necessary to determine the following:

1. whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal;

2. whether appellant is indigent; and

3. whether the appellant is entitled to appointed counsel.

Should it be determined appellant wishes to prosecute the appeal, is indigent, and is entitled to an appointed attorney, the trial court shall appoint counsel. If counsel is appointed, the name, address, telephone number, and state bar number of said counsel shall be included in an order appointing counsel. If necessary, the trial court shall issue findings of fact, conclusions of law, and any necessary orders it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues and cause its findings, conclusions, and orders to be included in a supplemental clerk's record. A supplemental record of the hearing, if any, shall also be prepared. The supplemental clerk's record and supplemental reporter's record, if any, shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before June 22, 2007.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State of Texas v. Martin Rodriguez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-texas-v-martin-rodriguez-texapp-2003.