Home/Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas/State of Texas v. Howard, Julius Virgil

State of Texas v. Howard, Julius Virgil

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 14, 2012·No. PD-1342-12·Published

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. PD-1342-12
JULIUS VIRGIL HOWARD, Appellant


v.



THE STATE OF TEXAS



ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE SECOND COURT OF APPEALS

TARRANT COUNTY

Per curiam. Keasler and Hervey, JJ., dissent.

ORDER

The petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.4(i), because it does not contain a copy of the opinion of the court of appeals.

The petition is struck. See Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.6.

The petitioner may redraw the petition. The redrawn petition and copies must be filed in the Court of Criminal Appeals within thirty days after the date of this order.



Filed: November 14, 2012

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State of Texas v. Howard, Julius Virgil, (Tex. 2012).

State of Texas v. Howard, Julius Virgil (State of Texas v. Howard, Julius Virgil) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.